Carmen: News story

#HedFest16

The #HedFest16 comittee is continuing with drop-in sessions to learn more about the festival, what it means for the town, how they can get involved and help out and how to make the event a success.

A drop-in took place at the St. Augustine’s Church, Hedon on Saturday morning with the current festival chairman David Thompson and church warden Sallie Nielsen who were  greeting coffee morning visitors. Several festival wristbands were sold and one person volunteered to help knit and sew for the festival yarn bombing campaign which will aim to promot the town’s street scene in bright and beautiful wool and cloth dressing for the festival.

Entry wristbands to #Hedfest16 have been kindly sponsored by Dennis Estate Agents. The ADVANCE prices are; £4 adults (green), £2 youth 6-16 (blue and yellow), family buy 2 adults, 2 youths for £10.

To start looking to buy your wristbands at the following locations in Hedon: The Haven Arms, The Queen’s Head, John Dennis Estate Agents… with street sales taking place on Saturday and Wednesday (Market Day) mornings, if weather permits it.

The Hedon Festival takes place on Friday evening 12th August and from 12 noon on Saturday 13th August 2016.

HedFest is managed by an organising committee comprising of Hedon Town Council and Cornucopia Festivals and Entertainment and other volunteers. HedFest is still looking for voulenteers, and advises anyone who wishes to find out more about the festival or looking for an opportunity to sell/have a stall get in touch.

Carmen: 300 word story

Flood risk concern: Wychcroft Campaign

 

CAMPAIGNING residents are concerned about the risk of flooding in the Magdalen Lane area if a housing development is permitted at Wychcroft are happy that their appeal to ‘crowd fund’ an independent engineering consultant is gaining support with £500 being pledged towards the estimated £1,000 needed.

A Planning Application for permission to build 28 homes on Wychcroft, Hedon was refused by the East Riding of Yorkshire Council in December 2015. However, the Applicant of Birstall May Ltd has now lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate against East Riding Council’s refusal.

Margaret Murray, who is one of the residents leading the campaign group said that they dispute some of the information in the original planning application about flood levels in 2007. “Photographs taken at the time show how much water levels rose in 2007 and these levels have not been adequately reflected in the planning documentation. The Planning Application submitted includes a sophisticated flood alleviation plan which is claimed to avert the possibility of flooding caused by the development. This is what we dispute most strongly.”

Residents say that they were flooded out in the big flood of 2007 with disruption to normal life lasting for up to a year,  they fear building on Wychcroft is going to remove the natural flood plain increasing the flood risk to local residents, which could be a disaster for all involved.

The residents have launched a financial appeal to employ an independent engineering consultant to review the proposed flood alleviation scheme. “This crowd-funded appeal for around £1,000 has been successful in raising over half the amount in pledges,” said Mrs. Murray on Saturday (14th May 2016).

John Baron: 2000 word essay (CATS)

 

In this essay I will be comparing the journalistic styles and techniques of Dan Rather and Glenn Greenwald. Two journalists who have one fundamental difference between them, the years they started their careers in journalism. Dan Rather (born October 31st, 1931) became a journalist in 1950 as an Associated press reporter in Texas. He spent nine years working in printed press before entering his career in television. He reported on local news stories and accidents, where he built up knowledge of journalism and broadcasting. In 1959 he started his television career and had reported on a serious Hurricane threat to Texas, in his autobiography he explains the difficulty of the job before technological advances.

 

“back then, television stations did not have their own radar systems, and there was no modern computerized radar that combines the radar image with an outline map. So he took a camera crew to the U.S. Weather Bureau office with a WSR-57 radar console located on the 5th floor of the Post Office Building on 25th Street in downtown Galveston” 1

 

This contrasts with the early career of Glenn Edward Greenwald (born March 6, 1967) who started his formal career as a Litigation Attorney in 1994, before later becoming a contributing writer for Salon.com, a controversial media website which investigated the 2001 Anthrax Attacks and candidacy of a CIA official being up for Director. The website soon generated thousands of hits due to Greenwald’s controversial stance and won’t-back-down attitude to corruption and cover-ups.

 

Similarly, Rather and Greenwald’s stance on corruption, lies and cover-ups in the media give them the inspiration to write and cover news that would seem too sensitive to publish by others. For example, Dan Rather is well known for his interview and suggestion that former President Richard Nixon being attached to the Watergate scandal first hand. Rather interviewed Nixon while he was still the White House Correspondent, as the interview was ending Rather said

“Thank you, Mr. President. Dan Rather, of CBS News.” The room filled with jeers and applause, prompting Nixon to joke, “Are you running for something?” Rather replied, “No, sir, Mr. President. Are you?”

it has been interpreted that in his question, Rather accused Nixon of not cooperating with the grand jury investigation and the House Judiciary Committee in relation to the Watergate scandal. Rather’s tough coverage of the scandal continued until the truth was finally revealed to the public. His integrity as a journalist pushed him to seek the truth for American citizens.

 

In contrast to Rather’s uncomfortable interview, Greenwald became a figure of controversy in the media, he was writing for the Guardian in 2013 when he was contacted by the NSA whistle-blower, Verax aka Edward Snowden. He was unsuspectingly falling into one of the biggest lies ever told by the American Government. In his research, and through the help of his anonymous source (Verax) he uncovered the truth that the NSA and GCHQ were tapping and monitoring the phone lines of American and English civilians. This became one of the biggest news stories of the generation, and due to social media and the internet blew up globally. Greenwald perused the story even after been issues death threats and intimidation from the Government, making Greenwald a journalistic hero.

Although even now in an age of new technology and advances to how News is delivered to the audience and designed to be easily digestible over the internet, television remains America’s number one source of news.

 

“according to a recent poll from Roper Starch Worldwide. When asked where they usually get most of their news, 69 percent of adults cited television versus 37 percent for newspapers, 14 percent for radio, 7 percent from “other people” and 5 percent from magazines, the study noted.1 Only 2 percent of the general public mentioned on-line sources for news. Among households that have Internet access, television was still the top source of news (59 percent) with on-line services mentioned by 15 percent.” 3

 

Facts and statistics like these show that television is still as prominently watched now for News as it was when Dan Rather was reporting. Rather was the living symbol, in conservative circles, of the power and presumption of the media….Rather had been working on an inquiry iand in January CBS put in for an interview with Bush — an extended sitting, the network said, to be edited down to five minutes or so of tape for a “profile” of the vice president. Although it has been said critically that Rather had embarrassed himself with an opinionated attack on the Vice President, trying to hide his outburst with a cloak of cool professionalism.

 

The way in which Rather and Greenwald approached sensitive subjects is extremely different. Rather holds himself with a professional demeanor in his interview while asking questions which may seem less than professional, to trick the interviewee into conversing about something they did not intend to. This is a journalistic technique to get a new answer, as they possibly will be thrown of by the manner in which it was asked. Though this technique had many Bush supporters question his journalistic integrity, as he was so opinionated.

 

“Don’t allow yourself to be flattered that this big star is talking to you; alternatively, don’t allow your dislike of them or resentment of their wealth, beauty, brains or success to tempt you to write what you think will be a definitive demolition job. When printed, it will invariably say more about you than it does them.” (David Randall, P 89)

 

The true differences in the two journalists comes from their writings, Greenwald writes for Salon.com and shows no fear as he writes about the type of topics the broadcast news usually chooses to be “too touchy”, Edward Snowden (the NSA whistleblower) had said that the articles Greenwald wrote about the political situations in America where what persuaded him to send him the NSA files. In this 2016 article, he writes about his experiences and knowledge of the security of American citizens.

 

 

“Using encryption software was something I had long intended to do. I had been writing for years about WikiLeaks, whistleblowers, the hacktivist collective known as Anonymous, and had also communicated with people inside the U.S. national security establishment. Most of them are concerned about the security of their communications and preventing unwanted monitoring. But the program is complicated, especially for someone who had very little skill in programming and computers, like me. So it was one of those things I had never gotten around to doing.”

 

In this extract Greenwald knowingly writes about topics which have before put him in danger from the Government and even had him fearing for his life. This disregard for his own safety in place for the truth has had some say he is one of the greatest journalists of our time. Along with being an author on The Guardian and Salon.com, his knowledge in the Legal system is extensive as he studied Law for many years, these combined talents make for sincere and honest writings. When he writes “I…also communicated with people inside the U.S. national security establishment.” It conveys a professionalism and that he is a well-respected and trusted journalist, whom many people seek out to voice what they see to be wrong-doings when they realize that their story may come with severe repercussions.

 

Dan Rather has years of experience in journalism, political debates and topics of National Security. He was the anchor of CBS News when he was decided to be the most professional political correspondent to be the interviewer for major political issues. This was proven as Rather interviewed the Vice President at the time, George Bush. During this interview Rather became frustrated as the Vice President clearly avoided questions, resulting in an iconic TV moment where Rather stated: stated: “We are told [the documents] were taken from Lieutenant Colonel Killian’s personal files” and incorrectly asserted that “the material” had been authenticated by experts retained by CBS. The authenticity of the documents was challenged within hours on Internet forums and blogs, with questions initially focused on alleged anachronisms in the documents’ typography.

In his most recent article posted online, Rather uses the popular online storytelling website Mashable.com as the first Presidential Republican Debate was close, Rather posted some pre-debate analysis. The piece is structured in the form of a drinking game. It laid out things to look for, predictable GOP buzzwords and one-liners from Trump.  The Mashable post is the second act to Rather’s career, one which should see him step foot into digital soil and cooperating his own production company (News Guts and Media) an interview show he hosts on ASX TV. Rather, now 83 and still calling himself  “a workaday reporter”,  is a throwback to another era and a product of a different time, back when serious men with voices suitable for TV delivered news report’s that much of the nation would tune in to watch. So this transition to online journalism comes at the peak time to break out into the internet.

Similar to Greenwald’s unashamedly honest article on whistleblowers, Rather’s piece on the Presidential Debate is hilariously accurate and more like a Buzzfeed article that a true journalistic piece. But with added personality and knowledge of political debates, Rather creates an intriguing and synical article.

 

 

“If you took a swig of alcohol every time President Obama’s name is mentioned with a sneer of        disgust from these candidates, you will likely find yourself passed out before the first commercial break.

One thing that has made it so hard for any of these people to stand out from the crowd is that they actually agree on most things policy-wise. But what they agree about most of all is that President Obama isn’t just the worst president America has ever had, he has single-handedly moved this country backward in almost every category that once made the United States great.”

Speaking from the heart and being opinionated, Rather sounds similar to Greenwald in the respects they are not afraid to speak their mind as long as it is what they see as the “right thing to do”, but this could be equally troubling as they are both Republican supporters.

Gone are the days of the communal TV experience, as even Rather admits his news consumption tools now include the iPhone 6 and a tablet, the way he gathers the news hasn’t changed. He plays with the knowledge that the 2016 presidential campaign will cost upto $5bn plus saying “Who’s giving what to whom, and for what in return?” Also musing over celebrity journalism, even lumping himself in at times, saying practitioners too often ignore the “Dickensian side of society”.

In conclusion I believe both Rather and Greenwald are equally respected journalists with integrity and cover stories and situations which are to be handled with the upmost professionalism. Though each can be taken the wrong way, coming across extremely right-wing in a journalistic setting which should be unbiased and not contain one’s own political stance. Yet in the age of online journalism, boundaries are not set with how far a journalist can go in terms of bias and freedom of speech. Obviously they are to be taken seriously, yet with a pinch of salt. Their writings show knowledge of Law and Political proceedings, Law being Greenwald’s specialty and Politics being Rather’s from years of broadcast journalistic reporting on debates and presidential candidate interviews.

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

1 On the Go.” Houston Chronicle, August 11, 1963, p. 15.

 

3 christopher Harper . (). Journalism in a Digital age. Available: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/papers/harper.html. Last accessed 20/jul/2016.

 

“Richard Nixon: Question-and-Answer Session at the Annual Convention of the National Association of Broadcasters, Houston, Texas”. American Presidency Project. March 19, 1974. 2

 

http://www.salon.com/2014/05/13/i_have_been_to_the_darkest_corners_of_government_and_what_they_fear_is_light_partner/

 

http://mashable.com/2015/08/06/dan-rather-debate-drinking-game/#fOo_J9_Nkkqo

 

http://mashable.com/2015/08/06/dan-rather-debate-drinking-game/#fOo_J9_Nkkqo

Reflection on my Immersive Experience’s presentation.

My Presentation on Immersive Experiences.

This is a written conclusion of my findings while researched for the five immersive website experiences. To begin my research I became more familiar with the technicalities of what makes a website immersive. The Google definition for immersive (websites) is (of a computer display or system) generating a three-dimensional image which appears to surround the user. Being interactive to fully immerse the user. This narrowed my search down to three-dimensional using websites that entrance the reader by surrounding them with 3d imagery, sound effects and interactive details.

The first site chosen was justareflektor.com. This website was created by Google Chrome and allows the user to control the lighting effects and camera positions using your mouse, web cam or tablet. This experience is immersive as the music surrounds the user while they interact with the making of the music video. The perfect way to immerse yourself into this website is to use headphones/earphones, this allows the pitch and volume of the music to be changed as you move your mouse across the screen. Using the mouse to hover over the video changes the video in different aspects depending on where in the video you are. At the start the mouse is used to change light direction, the middle brings up illustrations of the protagonist in the video being held by ropes, and at the end the mouse controls the camera positions and lighting.

The second site I used was deadliestcatch360.com which is a 360 view on board the ships that feature in the show The Deadliest Catch. This website was immersive as it has little to no boundaries in terms of being fully 360, the site allows the user to click on different graphics to bring up stories of the crew, facts of fishing and other trivia is also included. The site allows the user to go on a full tour of each shipping vessel (five in total) with amazingly clear images. Different parts of the ships are explained through pop up facts and figures to do with the fishing trade and difficulties such as weather during the long haul seasons. The cast and crew are also interactive as you are enabled to click on anyone you like to find out personal stories, facts and skill lists.

Another immersive website chosen is the Riga Ghetto and Latvian Holocaust Museum online which uses 360 tours using Google maps and location to show the difference between photographs taking during the Holocaust to the street view of the area in 2015. This website is immersive in different ways, as it tells a story throughout after you interact with the site and choose a story to follow. The site uses long-form mixed with sound and illustrations to coincide with the stories.

Inside Abbey Road is another immersive site, as compared to the previous website seems far more immersive just because of the 360 tour of the whole building, in studio rooms, managerial rooms, orchestra sound recording rooms. The experience is made immersive with the use of interactive graphics which you can press and take you anywhere you want to go to learn anything you wanted to know about Abbey Road. Inside Abbey Road was defined by it’s crystal clear 3D images and felt much more like watching a movie than clicking your way through a large building.

The final interactive experience is The Wilderness Downtown, which was created by Google Chrome Experiments. This website asks you to enter a postcode, and then asks to allow pop-ups. This website was the first of it’s kind and was released in 2013. The site uses pop-ups and tabs in your web browser to show images of a person running to the sound of the background music (We Used To Wait – Acrade Fire) and uses Google Street View of the postcode you entered to draw the user (who knows that area) into the happenings on screen. The wilderness Downtown is an interactive multimedia video coded in HTML5 and was published to show the capabilities of the new Google Chrome browser.

Each of the sites I selected was in their own way immersive, using 3 dimensional imagery to surround the reader. The most immersive from the list The Wilderness Downtown as it uses so many different techniques to create the immersive experience, for example the use of choreographed windows, interactive flocking, custom rendered maps, real-time compositing, procedural drawing, 3D canvas rendering… this Chrome Experiment has them all. “The Wilderness Downtown” is an interactive interpretation of Arcade Fire’s song “We Used To Wait” and was built entirely with the latest open web technologies, including HTML5 video, audio, and canvas.

InDesign

The final two pages of my magazine spread were probably the easiest. I split up the large amount of text with another 4 photo spread picture and a quote, then followed on with the text on the next page. The photo I used was another from Kylies Instagram account, and shows the uniqueness of her style. kj3

On the page with the picture I placed a large quote over the left, making sure not to cover her face or phone. The quote goes with the text of the story and the image adds a GenX feel to the piece as you can tell she is taking a selfie in a mirror (like most girls do now). The text continues on the next page (right) and finishes with details of the new Kardashian series. I will probably end up putting a graphic under the text to do with Kylies make-up, E! entertainment, or the Kardashians show itself.

InDesign

For the text, I have made the layout as simple as possible after my research looking at other high-fashion magazines. In Glamour and Vogue, they place large amounts of texts n white backgrounds usually with nothing else added. I have done the same with my text.

kj2

Though it may look un-interesting to some, I think the way the text is spread out makes it way easier to read than if there were pictures surrounding the text. I have used some quotations in the top right corner, and using a numbered list made it easier for the reader to become involved.